Complaint mechanisms are an important element of human rights-basedapproaches to development. Such mechanisms empower people to voicetheir grievances, seeking to hold international development actors account-able to rights-holders in project-affected communities. Although acknowl-edging the important potential of complaint mechanisms, this studyhighlights that the availability of such mechanisms is a necessary but not asufficient condition for accountability in international development cooper-ation. Complaint mechanisms can only effectively create accountability ifthey adhere to principles of citizen-driven accountability such as beingaccessible, independent, and transparent. We further argue that complaintmechanisms must include safeguards against reprisals to address the risk ofretaliatory repression against complainants. We examine the implementationof complaint mechanisms in development cooperation practice with respectto both their inclusion in planning documents and their perception by proj-ect staff and rights-holders. We draw on the case of bilateral German devel-opment cooperation. Using qualitative and quantitative content analysis,our results show that complaint mechanisms are often not included inproject-planning documents. Further evidence on local perceptions of com-plaint mechanisms based on interviews and focus groups in India andNigeria demonstrates that complaint mechanisms are frequently not knownin project-affected communities and that right-holders refrain from partici-pation because they fear reprisals. Hence, an important prerequisite foraccountability is missing. The results call for substantial improvements ofcomplaint mechanisms in German and, potentially, international develop-ment cooperation.
Bibliographische Angaben
